Veterans Alliance is privately owned and operated to serve veterans. We are not affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Veterans Alliance — Veterans Alliance
← All Oklahoma benefits
otherstate

PTSD as a Mitigating Factor at Sentencing — What the Court May Consider

A court making a sentencing decision about a veteran may consider as a mitigating factor that the person has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from military service. The section sets out exactly two documents the defendant must produce, and one of them is a certification of combat-zone service.

Verified August 23, 2026

What this benefit is

A court making a sentencing decision about a veteran may consider as a mitigating factor that the person has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from military service. The section sets out exactly two documents the defendant must produce, and one of them is a certification of combat-zone service.

What it's worth: A mitigating factor the court may consider — discretionary, not a reduction

  • The section is permissive: the court MAY consider the diagnosis as a mitigating factor. It does not require any reduction and attaches no figure.
  • The defendant must provide documentary evidence of two things.
  • First, service in the Armed Forces of the United States in a combat zone as defined in section 112 of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986, proved by a certification by the Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
  • Second, a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder connected to that service.
  • "Post-traumatic stress disorder" takes the DSM-5 (2013) meaning, and must have occurred as a result of events during service in one or more combat zones.
  • The section was added by Laws 2016, c. 197, §1, effective 1 November 2016.

Who is entitled to it

  • The section is about the veteran being sentenced.
  • You served in the armed forces.
  • Your home is in Oklahoma.

Not sure whether that describes you?

Answer a few questions about this benefit specifically — we only ask what this one actually depends on, and we stop as soon as we know.

How to claim it

Deadline: Before sentencing — the section speaks to the sentencing decision only
  1. 1Tell your defence lawyer about the service and the diagnosis at the first meeting, not the week before sentencing. Both documents take time to obtain.
  2. 2Get the combat-zone certification from the Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The section names that certification specifically as the proof, so a DD Form 214 alone may not be treated as enough.
  3. 3Check what counts as a combat zone: the section borrows section 112 of the federal Internal Revenue Code, which is the combat-zone tax exclusion definition, not a general deployment test.
  4. 4Get the diagnosis in writing and have it say the disorder is connected to service. A diagnosis that does not make that link does not meet the second condition.
  5. 5Expect discretion, not arithmetic. The court may consider the factor; nothing in the section obliges it to reduce anything.
  6. 6Ask separately whether the county runs a diversion or treatment programme. That is a different route from this one and is not created by this section.
Form
Sentencing memorandum or mitigation filing in the criminal case
File with
The court making the sentencing decision
Documents you will need
va benefit summary letter
No renewal
Once granted it does not need renewing.
CorrectionThis is a sentencing provision, not a veterans treatment court. Title 22 as published by the Senate was read through this session and contains no veterans treatment court statute. Any such court operating in a county does so under some other authority, which was not established here.
Worth knowingThe combat-zone gate is narrow. A veteran with service-connected PTSD but no combat-zone service does not meet subsection B(1) as written, however strong the diagnosis is.
Known gapNothing read this session says how often courts apply the section, or whether any appellate decision construes it. Case-law hosts were not opened.

Sources

Why only one source type: The section is short and was read in full from the Senate’s own compilation of Title 22. It creates the whole of the right described; no second source adds to it.

This finder provides an informational match, not a government eligibility determination. The responsible agency decides your application.