06 Dec How far is the Chinese bill to extradite fugitive from hong kong fair?
How far is the Chinese bill to extradite fugitive from hong kong fair?
Hong Kong has seen huge protests ignited by a notably controversial plan to permit extraditions to mainland China.
Today’s gathering, and commitments by businesses to strike, come just days after an expected one million people flooded the streets of Hong Kong on June 9, 2019, in a massive protest against a proposal – which many here have addressed as an evil law, even as the government has said it’s urgently required to limit Hong Kong from being a haven for fugitives.
After protests that organizers said involved up to 2 million people at times, Hong Kong’s leader Carrie Lam has said the bill is dead but has halted short of eliminating the bill entirely, so the protests continue.
The existing extradition law explicitly states that it does not apply to the Central People’s Government or the government of any other part of the People’s Republic of China.
Coming to talk about what proponents believe, we must understand that going by the law makes pretty much sense, especially when the topics are controversial enough to flood the streets with the citizen.
Going by the vast majority’s emotional aspect is never considered a good idea when it comes to handling national matters.
Now, the government endorsed the proposed amendments by declaring it would help plug the loopholes so that the city ceases to be a safe haven for criminals.
According to the news reports,
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs says the amendments to an extradition bill of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) will not hamper the global confidence toward the city, noting that the central government will continue to support the SAR’s work.
“Hong Kong keeps thriving and maintaining its stability since its return to China, the policy of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and ‘Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong’ have been fully implemented,” said the ministry’s spokesperson.
While on the contrary, opponents debated that those in the former British colony would be disclosed to China’s highly flawed justice system, and it might commence to further destruction of the city’s judicial independence.
Opposition to the law was popular from the commencement, with groups from all sections of society – varying from lawyers to housewives – voicing their criticism or beginning petitions.
Critics assume the new law will ruin the integrity of the city’s legal system and guide at the end of Hong Kong’s (paywall) unique legal status.
Moreover, Several countries also expressed concern:
A US congressional commission said in May it risked making Hong Kong more susceptive to China’s political coercion and further erode Hong Kong’s sovereignty.
Britain and Canada said they were concerned about the potential effect that the proposed changes would have on UK and Canadian citizens in Hong Kong.
The Wise lady once said, choosing one side is always going to make you biased, but how far that makes sense to you just makes everything a little less rough.
What is your opinion?